ABBThe Founding
8 min readChapter 2

The Founding

The strategic imperative to create a globally competitive entity intensified significantly during the mid-1980s, driven by a confluence of economic shifts, technological advancements, and a rapidly consolidating global industrial landscape. This period saw increased globalization of markets, heightened competition from Japanese and American conglomerates, and rising R&D costs for complex electrical and automation technologies. These pressures ultimately led to the landmark decision to merge Sweden's ASEA AB and Switzerland's Brown, Boveri & Cie (BBC). This momentous event, culminating in the formation of ABB Asea Brown Boveri in 1988, was not merely a financial transaction but a profound strategic realignment aimed at achieving the necessary scale, technological breadth, and global market penetration to thrive in an increasingly demanding environment. The architects of this ambitious merger, Percy Barnevik, then CEO of ASEA, and Fritz Leutwiler, chairman of BBC, envisioned a transnational corporation that could combine the engineering prowess, complementary product portfolios, and extensive market reach of both venerable organizations. The merger was fundamentally a response to the perceived need for a "European champion" capable of competing effectively with industrial giants such as Siemens, General Electric, and Hitachi, which possessed formidable financial resources and global footprints.

Prior to the merger, both companies operated with distinct corporate cultures, organizational structures, and strategic priorities. ASEA, founded in 1883, was a highly successful Swedish engineering company with a strong tradition of innovation, particularly in high-voltage power transmission, robotics, and industrial automation. While international in its sales and operations, it maintained a relatively centralized management structure and a cohesive, albeit somewhat hierarchical, Swedish identity. Its strong emphasis on R&D and technological leadership had given it an edge in specific niche markets. In contrast, Brown, Boveri & Cie, founded in 1891, was a Swiss-based multinational with a broader and more diverse global presence, particularly strong in power generation (turbines, generators) and electrical distribution equipment across continental Europe, the UK, and parts of the Americas. BBC's structure was more decentralized, characterized by autonomous national subsidiaries and a multi-local approach that allowed for greater adaptation to regional market conditions. The merger presented a significant integration challenge, requiring not only the harmonization of overlapping product lines and disparate technological standards but also the intricate process of aligning operational processes and corporate governance across diverse geographies and deeply ingrained business unit practices. Internal discussions and extensive planning, as documented in company reports from the time, focused on forging a new corporate identity that transcended national affiliations while meticulously preserving and leveraging the best aspects of each legacy company's heritage in engineering excellence and market acumen. The legal and financial complexities involved structuring a new parent company with equal ownership stakes between ASEA's and BBC's original shareholders, a novel approach for such a large-scale international merger at the time.

In 1988, the merger was officially concluded, creating a company with approximately 160,000 employees and pro forma revenues of around $17 billion (equivalent to roughly $40 billion in 2023 dollars when adjusted for inflation). Percy Barnevik, widely regarded as a visionary leader with a reputation for aggressive restructuring and global expansion, was appointed as the first CEO of the combined entity. His leadership was instrumental in shaping ABB's early operational philosophy, notably the rapid implementation of a highly decentralized "federated structure" model. This model sought to combine global coordination with extreme local autonomy, aiming to decentralize operational decision-making to hundreds of individual business units, often operating as legally distinct local companies, while maintaining central strategic oversight, financial control, and shared technology platforms. The objective, frequently articulated by Barnevik, was to be "global and local" simultaneously – leveraging global scale for purchasing, R&D, and brand recognition, while empowering local units to adapt products and services to specific market needs and competitive dynamics. This model was a direct counterpoint to the more centralized approaches of some competitors and reflected a belief that proximity to the customer was paramount for competitive advantage in diverse industrial markets. Barnevik's mandate was clear: achieve radical cost efficiencies, foster a competitive entrepreneurial spirit within the organization, and accelerate global growth.

Early operations following the merger focused intensely on rationalizing overlapping product lines and consolidating manufacturing facilities across the vast new footprint. Both ASEA and BBC had extensive portfolios in power generation, transmission, and distribution equipment, as well as industrial automation, including robotics (an area where ASEA was a pioneer with its IRB 6 and IRB 1000 series robots) and process control systems. The immediate task was to identify synergies, eliminate redundancies that led to inefficient parallel development and production, and establish clear, consolidated product strategies for each market segment. For instance, in the critical transformer business, where both companies had strong, albeit regionally distinct, offerings, a deliberate strategy was implemented to combine the best technologies from both portfolios and streamline production across the new global network of factories. Similarly, in electrical switchgear, circuit breakers, and motors, product standardization and consolidation were prioritized. This period involved significant organizational restructuring and, inevitably, workforce adjustments as operations were optimized for global scale and efficiency. Reports indicate several thousand job reductions occurred in the initial years, particularly in Europe, as production sites were rationalized and administrative functions streamlined. The aim was not just cost reduction but also improved product quality and faster time-to-market by focusing R&D efforts and manufacturing expertise.

Initial funding for the merged entity was robust, drawing upon the combined financial strength and substantial asset bases of both legacy companies. The merger was largely effected through a share exchange, ensuring that both ASEA and BBC shareholders held 50% of the new ABB Ltd. The combined entity's strong balance sheet and established cash flows meant the focus was primarily on leveraging this financial base for further strategic acquisitions and organic growth, rather than seeking immediate, large-scale external funding rounds. Early investors and market analysts generally viewed the merger positively, recognizing the compelling strategic logic behind creating a larger, more diversified industrial player capable of competing directly with global giants like Siemens, General Electric, and Hitachi, especially in the burgeoning power and automation sectors. However, there were also acknowledged concerns regarding the sheer complexity of integrating such disparate entities, the potential for significant cultural clashes between the Swedish and Swiss organizational norms, and the challenging task of realizing projected synergies in a vast, global conglomerate. The market capitalization of the combined entity immediately placed it among the top-tier global industrial players, a crucial factor for attracting capital and talent in the increasingly competitive global economy.

Building the new ABB team involved a deliberate and intensive effort to blend talent from both ASEA and BBC, aiming to cultivate a truly transnational management corps. Leadership positions at the newly formed global business unit level and in country operations were often filled by individuals from both legacy companies, fostering a sense of shared ownership and a balanced perspective in the new enterprise. Company culture, while initially a blend of the existing norms, quickly evolved under Barnevik's influential leadership to emphasize speed, radical decentralization, clear accountability for profit and loss at even low organizational levels, and a relentless focus on aggressive market expansion. To bridge cultural differences and foster a unified identity, the creation of cross-national management teams and the adoption of English as the common corporate language were mandated. Intensive management training programs were implemented to inculcate the new ABB way of working, emphasizing entrepreneurial spirit, customer focus, and operational efficiency across all levels of the organization.

Major milestones in ABB's early years included a rapid and aggressive expansion into new geographical markets, particularly in Eastern Europe and Asia following the geopolitical shifts of the late 1980s and early 1990s. The fall of the Berlin Wall and the subsequent opening of former communist economies presented immense opportunities for infrastructure development and industrial modernization, areas where ABB's expertise in power generation, transmission, and factory automation was critically needed. This period saw ABB establishing or expanding operations significantly in countries like Poland, Hungary, and the Czech Republic. A series of strategic acquisitions immediately began to bolster its market position, demonstrating Barnevik's "string of pearls" acquisition strategy. A prime example was the acquisition of parts of Westinghouse Electric's transmission and distribution business in North America shortly after the merger in 1989. This acquisition was strategically crucial, instantly providing ABB with a substantial market share and established customer base in the vital North American market, complementing its European strength and making it a truly global competitor in key power technologies. Other significant early acquisitions included Combustion Engineering in 1990, expanding ABB's footprint in process automation and power plant services. This initial period was characterized by aggressive growth, an unyielding drive for efficiency, and the successful establishment of the ABB brand as a recognized global leader in power and automation technologies, effectively achieving initial product-market fit on an unprecedented global scale. By 1992, ABB's annual revenues had grown to approximately $29 billion, underscoring the success of its initial expansion strategy.